The world of work is being turned upside down every day by innovations spearheaded by artificial intelligence. Until recently, it was only workers who had to fear being replaced by machines. Today, it is a whole part of society that could eventually see its work replaced by artificial intelligence. Even if the results are not always as good as those produced by humans, they will soon improve to surpass them while offering unbeatable costs. So we all have serious concerns. The human in many cases will become the substitute for the machine or the algorithm. This subordinate role has not been seen since the advent of factories. Non-manual professionals were protected, but this is not the case, soon their jobs will evaporate by the thousands.
Entrepreneurship As A Lifeline
In reality, most companies have difficulty anticipating social and technological changes. Their lack of vision and the complexity of their structure make them not very agile. To face this changing world, humans will have to find a universe that their ancestors knew very well: entrepreneurship or craftsmanship if we put ourselves in the context of the time.
In Order Not To Disappear, We Will Have To Be Agile In Acquiring Skills
The employee is dead in the long run except for the sectors that generate large revenues and can afford to have a mode of operation that is not agile. To survive, the employee will have to become a digital artisan. He will have to test his skills directly in the market by truly seeing if he can create value. Of course this change will cause great precariousness but also professional “deaths” for those who will be unable to adjust to the market.
You Are Already Competing With The World On A Professional Level. It Is A Race That You Must Take Seriously, Only The Best Or Most Useful Will Survive In The End.
The world is increasingly competitive, and as a professional, you are taking part in this race. It is essential that you take it seriously if you hope to succeed and remain relevant. Artificial intelligence (AI) and obsolescence are two of the main challenges that we all need to address in the race for the top.
As artificial intelligence (AI) advances, people who remain stagnant may be replaced by machines. It is essential to commit to re-training and expanding skills in order to remain technologically advanced and competitive. Similarly, obsolescence is a constant threat as new technologies enter the market. It is important to keep up with the ever-evolving trends in order to remain on the cutting edge.
Those who remain ahead of the competition are those who are continuously pushing the boundaries and striving to be the best. To stay ahead, companies must develop and nurture innovation, analyze new trends, remain agile, and continuously upgrade processes and technology. The application of best practices and methods can help companies stay ahead of the curve and remain competitive.
Organizations must also understand the importance of cultural fit. Companies should strive to create an environment where employees are encouraged to develop and express ideas. Companies should work to become places where employees feel safe to contribute, and where diversity is embraced and valued. This will ensure that competitiveness is occurring throughout the organization.
Finally, to stay ahead of the competition, companies must invest in talent management and in modern learning programs. This will help ensure that employees remain up to date with the latest trends and create an environment conducive to collaboration, innovation, and productivity.
Overall, competition is an integral part of the professional world and it is essential that you take it seriously if you hope to be successful. AI and obsolescence challenge us to stay ahead, while embracing a culture of diversity, innovation, and learning will ensure that we remain competitive.
A New Proletariat Will Undoubtedly Emerge. They Will Be The Ones Left Behind By The Digital World, They Will Not Have Succeeded In Breaking Through And Will Eventually Live On Social Assistance
In the digital age, a new proletariat is likely to emerge. Those who are unable to break through the ever-increasing demands of technology will be the ones who will be left behind. They will be the ones who will have fallen through the cracks, unable to keep up with the incessant changes of the digital world, and will eventually rely on social assistance to survive.
This is a situation that many find unacceptable as skills become increasingly important in today’s society. In an era where knowledge is key, those who do not readily adapt to the digital age will struggle and be sidelined. This does not only apply to those who are less fortunate in terms of social and economic standing, but also to those whose abilities lie outside the scope of technology. Although these people may have talents that are not easily quantified, their skills may remain undervalued in an increasingly digitised society.
It is in such a state of despair that a new proletariat would emerge, one not defined by their ability to earn income, but rather their lack of it. This situation would likely be accompanied by increasing inequality of opportunities, as technology renders some skills obsolete, while skills suited for the digital world become sought after by organisations. Such a situation would create a stark divide between those able to compete in the digital word, and those unable to break through and become excluded from the economy, leaving them to rely on social assistance to survive.
It is clear that the emergence of a new proletariat would have serious implications for both society and the economy. And yet, while their existence may be lamentable, it highlights the importance of providing equal opportunities to all. For it is only by ensuring that everyone has access to the same skills and opportunities that an equitable digital future can become a reality.
In conclusion:
Is another world possible? The ultra-liberalism towards which these technologies push us is less and less human. Shouldn’t we propose an alternative at the risk of appearing hippie and being marginalized in turn? At a macroeconomic level, yes, technologies are important because they reinforce the dominance of states, but at a macroscopic level they can lead to the crushing of the individual. Living off the land, in the countryside and trying to become a Renaissance man or woman could be a desirable alternative for a whole part of the population even if it thwarts the plans of those who are in charge of the countries.
